Sunday, September 26, 2010

Looks Like Chicken Pox Only On Legs

Exoticism and eroticism in women's representation


I. The girl of many eyes.

The look is a girl with many eyes. Yes, indeed, a little monstrous, as the child of Tim Burton, whose misshapen head, eyes invade countless other ways. I also found this strange sight girl, the other day in the park, but do not talk about their kinds of poetry but of ethnic picture and the problem of knowledge through which one looks the other eye.

photographically perceive and represent ethnic groups, with the eyes of our own history, identity, experience, artistic endeavor or scientific, political positioning, socioeconomic class, knowledge, imagination, etc.., ie from a particular culture that washes our view of meaning. Thus, even though the eye of the photographer wants to pass as an innocent and naive girl eyes encounters with otherness, rather it is a dead fly girl, who constructs images of the other for herself, so far general, a deep knowledge of ethnic groups.


II. The girl exotic Maler

A business card in albumin and two collodions, made in 1873 and 1874, are the oldest pictures I know about women in the Mixteca in Oaxaca Coast. These pictures were taken by the German architect Teobert Maler, who joined the Austrian army in 1864 to support French troops in Mexico and after the intervention was devoted to selling hats parallel inside the country and touring portraiture.

Maler's photographs, the researcher Ignacio Gutierrez says, "are not popular types or ethnic or morphological types and much less images of the exotic but images of self-affirmation of the subjects represented for your enjoyment, privacy and family environment. " [1] Notwithstanding the question of the enjoyment was true in the case of Mixtec women have referred their portraits and they have been portrayed by his own will, which is likely since devoted itself Maler, between 1868 and 1878, to photograph clients in rural and indigenous populations, especially indigenous women and asked for it, the author does not seem to escape all the ethnic type, exoticism and the positivist philosophy that dominated the era.


Teobert Templates

It is noteworthy that none of the young Mixtec go straight to the camera. All profile pose with a neutral expression, absorbed in their thoughts, say their eyes at some indeterminate point in the scene. Their eyes make me think that the camera and / or photographer inspired them some discomfort or fear, caused perhaps by the fact that being portrayed means open to the perception of who is watching us, to let our body and face, and our experiences and contexts to be read by another, a man alien suspect that these women knew next to nothing.

Maler In the images, there is little context and interaction between photographer and photographed. It is rather a distant look in that sneaks some type of Mixtec women, not only because they are portrayed in a study that separates them momentarily from their culture, but because they are guided to be placed in a certain position and accommodate their pitchers in certain way.

The attempt to control some aspects of the scene and portrayed women as well as decisions to emphasize certain aspects through a cut or a specific angle, always carry the position of the photographer and his particular views on the world and people it portrays. Maler a single trial did not apply to groups ethnic for him outside the Indians was not as miserable as surface descriptions might suggest, sometimes clothing, food and sanitation were inadequate, but in others, the Indians swam almost daily and especially girls were noted for their beautiful traditional dress and always clean. [2]

While I do not know which of these categories were considered Maler Mixtec women, portraying usually half-length or three quarters, stood besides the clothes, the nakedness of their breasts, a feature that seems to have since become reasons of strangeness and exoticism.


Teobert Maler

III. The girl erotic Mutschlechner

Almost a century after Maler's photographs, another German, industrial photographer Mario Mutschlechner, conducted between 1967 and 1969 color images of women in the Mixteca de la Costa, in the municipalities of San Agustin Chayuco, Santa Maria and Santiago Nuti Ixtayutla.

It took 41 years for the author to publish these photographs in his book Ñundeui, at the foot of the sky ( conaculta , 2008). Given this timing, which occurred between the manufacturing and publishing images, the photographer was not able to establish a critical distance from their own images, nor with the realities that emerged. The unfortunate result is a book that stands by poverty and lack of updating their visual and written speeches. His images are available on http://zonezero.com/exposiciones/fotografos/nundeui/index.html.


Mario Mutschlechner

So in the XXI century, conceives Mutschlechner Mixteca de la Costa as "a wonderful island in the inhuman hurricane of modern times" and their photographs of the Mixtec women as a "handful of images that look innocent but until the driest part of man." And is that although at the time the author acknowledged problems existed in the communities of alcoholism and poverty, the preferred as it says in your own words "invent a tropical paradise," a world without malice, a retreat. " [3] their tropical paradise in the timeless, the Mixtec are an isolated group, innocent and pure, who live in communities without conflicts or greed, the noble savages of yesteryear. Under

browser romantic eyes, there is simply no place for violence. [4] accommodates What are your ideals and personal preferences based on which justifies the imposition of the erotic gaze: "What I like about these people was its purity. When viewing these topless women is evident that the wickedness of the nude not exist in his culture. "In his images, as in the case of Maler appear topless young women carrying jugs of water, but this time not in a studio, but bathing in the river or integrated into the tropical flora . Mixtec women sometimes seem rather watched by a voyeur photographer and lest we forget that the photographer likes indigenous breasts also have a couple of approaches to women's breasts Mixtec.

Mutschlechner 's photographs make me think that between the exoticism and eroticism of the photographic view there is only one letter that differentiates them in the end both deal with the excitement aroused by the visual, the first at the new and the strange, the second to the sensual.

also reminds me of Roger Bartra when he noted that the ethnic history of photography there are two blind spots: violence and eroticism. On the one hand, explains Bartra, the old stereotype of Indians as violent, bloodthirsty, dangerous, hostile aliens and mysterious beings who kill their own kind, has caused many photographers refuse to play this defamatory archetype. However, the violence is there and the photographer should reveal it. Likewise, photographers have shown reluctant to undress erotic gaze Indians with their cameras and enter the sensual intimacy of the Indians because of another archetype, the photographer and representative of modern society refuses to play the role of male conqueror who enters and rapes the helpless society Indian as its chamber is a phallic extension of the powers of the dominant society. So when it is doing so on behalf of science and progress with an objective lens devoid of eroticism. But the camera ends up betraying his own and put yourself in a position erotic naked bodies wandering around, I'll walk sexy and provocative smile insinuate the silhouette of unspeakable sexual desires, attractions, petting and flirtation. [5]

Mario Mutschlechner

True Mixtec women have been on several occasions looks and represented with this type of hidden eroticism, torn from their contexts and cultural identities pivilegiar only the aesthetic qualities of the image, or the intentional cover looks fanciful. In all cases, look, this girl appeared dead fly at the beginning of this essay, is transformed into a wicked woman in your imagine ultimately denies the other's existence.

Perhaps a possible solution to this selfish eye of the camera implanted in Mixtec women, is that photographers and apply some of the ideas from the sixties, anthropology asks: question of ethnographic authority (in this case photography) , abandoned as a source of power and legitimacy ethnographic discourse (photo), and try restorative informants (pictured) his own voice (image) into a mechanism of self-representation to generate a real dialogue and enables a visual representation fairer Mixtec women, through their own ways of being and being in the world.


Valeria Vega

June 2010



[1] Gutiérrez, I. Teoberto Maler. Story of a foógrafo become an archaeologist. Testimonials File / 1. SINAFER / INAH, Mexico, 2008.

[2] Maler, T. in ibid . p.75

[3] Mutschlechner, M. Ñundeui at the foot of the sky . Conaculta , Mexico, 2008. pp. 86 and 92.

[4] must notify you that d and according to the analysis of Violence in Oaxaca conducted in 1995-1996 by -Human Rights Center Miguel Agustin Pro Juarez Human Rights Centre Regional de la Mixteca, Center royals, Bartolomé Human Rights Center Carrrasco, Flor y Canto and Chinantla Indigenous Peoples, among other organizations. cit. For La Jornada September 1996 - between January 1, 1995 and July 4, 1996, Santiago Ixtayutla stood out as one of the most violent, with 13 murders. In 1995 there was a confrontation between residents of the community of San Lucas and members of Torch Atoyaquillo Campesina, leaving eight dead and several families displaced from their community in 1996, shot and killed of 45 elected mayor of Santiago Ixtayutla, Rigoberto Merino, or that in 1999, the confrontation between groups of different factions leaving a balance nine wounded and trying to lynch the current manager killed with machetes and shot the bodyguard of the administrator, the commander of the PJE and Xiniyuva person, in addition to being an amputee .

[5] Bartra, R. Stuffing the Indian Photographically in History of Photography, Mexican Photography. Vol 20, no. 3, Fall 1996. pp. 238-239. The article was first published as a preface to the catalog Glass Eye: A Hundred Years of Photography of Indian Mexico. Banco de Comercio Exterior, Mexico, 1992.



Ñundeui, at the foot of the sky

Answering Valeria Vega

by Mario Mutschlechner

just found in ethnic look (http://www.miradasetnicas.blogspot.com /) Article "Exoticism and eroticism in women's representation Mixtec" the ethnologist Valeria Vega public in June 2010 about my book Ñundeui, at the foot of the sky.

I will give my point of view of the findings of the ethnologist and thereby attempt to clarify "the problem of knowing through which eye is looking the other."

First of all I stress what I said in the book: Ñundeu i es una visión personal y de ninguna manera una representación etnográfica de las mujeres mixtecas. Es un trabajo artístico apreciado por destacados conocedores del mundo indígena como el recién fallecido escritor Carlos Montemayor, el lingüista e investigador del México antiguo Patrick Johansson, el arqueólogo Eduardo Matos Moctezuma, Culturas Populares del Conaculta y el periódico La Jornada, entre otros.

La oportunidad de retratar indígenas que no conocían los modelos occidentales del porte femenino, que no sabían de sostenes y de maquillaje fue significativo e importante for me. I tried to capture the natural beauty and sensuality of these young people without ever intervening in the way it is presented to the camera or, to quote Valeria Vega, without being involved in "their own way of being in the world."

Disappointed and hurt by capitalism dehumanized Germany of the Sixties I played that Indian culture from my point of view. wanted to "invent a tropical paradise" as a counterweight to the gray cities of Germany, a mechanized society of which came with a motivation and colors similar to those of the painter Paul Gauguin. To me these women made and represent a culture integrated tropical nature, to enjoy the time, silence, of their own emotional, and Knowing the sanctity and harmony of nature, values \u200b\u200bthat our Western society discarded in exchange for money and material goods .

did these photographs to emphasize that human beings are part of nature and that we learn from ancient cultures to live in harmony with it.

Many years later, based in Mexico City, discovered that some of my photographs displayed some of the most beautiful and popular verses of poetry Hispanic and mates to walk together.

This way I could illustrate with indigenous youth the ancient wisdom of "flower and song," I managed to connect with the transience of life and with the fact that the only thing that transcends the man is his art and thought.

To further reinforce this connection with the wisdom and world view of ancient Mexico exotic I have linked my pictures with pictograms codices

Columbian. This three-dimensional presentation of the Mexican indigenous world, never before performed, creates a synergy of forms, rhythms and meanings, which, in the words of Patrick Johansson "reconciles nature and humanity, reconciling past and present, and gives the look and feel the eternity of the moment. "

Valeria Vela I thank for having reported a photographer German Teobert Maler, who portrayed Mixtec women over 125 years. I'm the first to understand and evaluate the technical difficulties of any kind, this man must have passed at the beginning of photography to achieve its ethnographic documents. I also appreciate that Valeria is familiar with some villages in the Mixteca Mixteca Baja and the Coast and we talk, for example, violence in Santiago Ixtayutla.

conclusion appreciate your effort to analyze my work and point of view, but I do not understand that Ñundeui, at the foot of the sky is more than a document, poetry. Although she disagrees with the fact that I have portrayed in their natural Mixtec women should recognize semi-nudity, I did it with respect and with a vision that goes beyond their sensuality and physical presence.

For those who want to meet at the foot of the sky Ñundeui Annex league editorial

EDUCAL, which is available

http: / / www.educal.com.mx/detalle.php?categoria=&folio=3578&titulo

league and its presentation in 2009 by La Jornada:

http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2009/08/22/index.php?section=cultura&article = a04n2cul

Mexico City, January 18, 2011

mario.mutschlechner @ gmail.com

Siezures Cause Memory Loss

Mixtec Angelita Torres, a photographer for a day comca'c


In the face of Angelita Torres two thin lines: a dotted and a continuous almost perfect in its outline, serene eyes separated the rest of the face. A line of tiny dots and a circle around you, you decorate the tip of the nose. A little further down, at the height of the nostrils, other straight lines and shorter They stress cheekbones. Other lines, painted but not this time caused by the sun, life and history of women look out onto his forehead, sides of eyes and sides of the nose to the corners of his mouth, as well as the texture of the chin, that I can not tell if it is being portrayed tight because it causes some tension. By including face painting and clothing that bears can assure you it is a woman belonging to the group Comca'ac (Seri) located in Punta Chueca and Desemboque the coast of Sonora.

meeting in a following photo shows a woman wearing face painting and dress very similar, only this time it's not a woman Comca'ac, but the photographer Graciela Iturbide, who in 1981 traveled to the area for photos of her book Those who live in sand, which was part of the photographic books published by the then-FONAPAS INI. This image was what initially sparked my interest to write about this series what was intended Graciela to dress like a woman Comca'ac ? "Trying to understand or be sympathetic with the woman portrayed and community from the parameters of femininity and beauty Comca'ac ? Angelita "He proposed to give Grace her paintings and clothing? These questions swirled in my head and thus came the need to consult the series to see if this was response to my questions. Then resorted to the photographic archive of the CDI, where they are if not entirely, at least most of the negatives in this series ( http://69.170.138.130/ ~ media / cdi / login . php ) To my surprise the show was not ordered so I started to try to rebuild.

and found another image of the series that Angelita and Linda pose together to be portrayed. The proximity with which they are sitting made me think that among them was a certain friendship and complicity. The comparison I was inevitable; made up and dressed in the same way seemed to be the same age, between 35 and 40, both with long dark hair is combed in the middle game, yet, features and skin color of both women are clearly different. Finally, I find a big difference in their eyes, Graciela who looks confident and relaxed looking directly at the camera while Angelita less stiffly relaxed and he looks at the picture and who portrays? The look and attitude of the two suggests to me that maybe it was Luis Barjau, Grace's partner, who accompanied him on the trip.

Angelita and Linda leave the place in which they were portrayed, did Angelita's house? and I find possible second part of the series. On the one hand portraits of Angelita with a black veil in full sun and on the other hand portraits were undoubtedly Graciela taken the same day. Looking in detail both sets of pictures I find many similarities that I find fascinating: Angelita holding transparent black veil covering her head with both hands, placing Graciela on her head a white scarf with a similar stance and both arms portrayed in a cut to the waist. Angelita another wall, in profile with her veil and her arms crossed staring at the horizon does not seem aware of being photographed, Graciela profile with your scarf looks at the camera and a couple of his fingers that look in the lower left corner, confirm that although we do not see your arms crossed. Angelita with her veil in front, Graciela with her head scarf. Angelita in right profile with narrowed eyes, Graciela in left profile with his eyes half closed. Angelita corita load a head, Graciela carries a kind of small stands bare in the head. Angelita are photos of Grace, again I wonder who Graciela portrait? If, as was previously assumed Luis Barjau, it does call my attention to the coincidence of these shots Does Grace and Luis were so close as to unconsciously take the same type of situation? Was it a deliberate action? Assume that could take Angelita could be another option, given that the review found a picture where a woman appears Comca'ac portraying Grace camera when they turn Grace is taking on women . Personally, although I am strongly inclined to think in the latter case where Angelita is the photographer who portrays Grace, I find it interesting how the two women, regardless of culture, had a vision nearly identical to portray each other.

I choose another image where the two women return to be portrayed, Angelita Graciela left and right with the same proximity to the one shown above, but this time when full-length portrait, is warns Angelita is taller and thinner Graciela. We also see that they are in a desert climate and landscape on the sand bare foot looks Angelita, probably quite used to the heat. Behind them, perhaps the white house where they were previously portrayed Angelita while makeup. This time confirmed my suspicion that the picture who is Luis because then find an image on the same stage where Angelita is portrayed with Luis Among them are a significant distance that shows a very different from the two women. As a woman I know ethnologist provided within indigenous communities have access to female spaces and makes the acceptance in the male, so it is not surprising that distance even though the face of Luis also have been painted in the style Comca'ac . A tender tone is added to this picture by the presence of a dog-eared white spotted, the three look Graciela unison.

Last picture brings me back to the hypothesis Angelita as a photographer, is that in this image are Grace and Luis Who else was Angelita on the scene could haberles portrayed? The horizon dropped slightly in contrast to the horizon of the above photo taken by Grace, and the court reveal that dog was not someone looking to photographic technique, but in a rather spontaneous.

conclude that Grace and Luis have been portrayed by Angelita, she and the dog they look, are not Comca'ac like them, even to dress and paint the way they do, but are not total strangers, they were taught to paint, provided their clothes and then take a series of portraits. In the left portray Grace painted and dressed like Comca'ac temporarily took the place of Angelita, a woman Comca'ac , and Angelita to portray the couple of city folk, took Grace site, the photographer. At least one picture the roles been reversed, the usually observed (ethnic groups) look to those commonly observed them (photographers), but dressed as if they were always watched, so seductive fail me think about how others can be seen in absence of themselves.


Valeria Vega

March 2010.